Review > Roboto (Masters of the Universe Classics, Mattel)

By my count, Roboto is the 37th toy in the Masters of the Universe Classics toyline (counting Adam and Orko as two separate figures, counting Mo-Larr but not the lost-tooth Skeletor, and not counting the TRU 2-packs as separate figures, since they’re repaints). As a bonafide member of the vintage MOTU line–not POP, not NA, not 200X–Roboto was a guaranteed sellout. Frankly, it’s impressive he took as long as he did to sell out (three hours), though reverse-shoulders error may be partly to blame for that.

I have to confess something: I don’t think I was really into He-Man for all that long as a kid. Maybe two years–practically forever to a young kid, but not really that long in terms of the life of the MOTU brand in the ’80s. I had most of the original eight-back figures, plus quite a few vehicles–Battle Cat, the Battle Ram, and the Talon Fighter–and Castle Grayskull. But beyond those, the only post-1984 figures I remember owning are Hordak, Leech, and King Hiss–and I think I got all three of those more because they seemed like cool figures than because I was into the property. By 1985 I was knee-deep in the Transformers, a fad that would continue until the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles era. So, long story short, I never owned nor have any fond memories of Roboto.

Even the 200X Roboto, while cool, wasn’t one of my favorites. I prefer the sword-and-sorcery aspect of He-Man to the science fiction stuff, and Roboto is very sf. He also has the misfortune of looking a lot like a toy–in fact, I’ve often likened him to a corn popper. And his rotating gears gimmick, while a great feat of toy engineering and a fun gimmick, would probably have disappointed young Poe, who even at the age of six or seven knew robots should have circuitry, not gears.

So I wasn’t really excited about MOTUC Roboto. And the reverse-shoulders thing just made me even less excited; I contemplated not even opening my figure (for about 0.68 seconds–for a toy collector, that is nearly an eternity). Let’s see out how he fared when he arrived.

Packaging: Mattel hasn’t changed anything up for Roboto–it’s the same packaging we’ve seen many a time before.

Design & Sculpt: Let’s get the sculpt out of the way before we talk about the action feature. Roboto’s legs and pelvis are re-use, from Trap Jaw and Optikk.

The torso, arms, and head are all brand-new on Roboto. I don’t often fault the Four Horsemen on their sculpting, and I’m not going to do it now. As usual, they’ve done a great job of updating the vintage figure, streamlining it and adding a few new details here and there. I’ve heard some fans say that Roboto’s torso is a bit too small, and I can kind of see what they’re getting at; but I’m wondering if that’s an optical (optikkal?) illusion caused by the see-through plastic.

Then there’s the action feature. It’s true that not I’m an action feature kind of guy, and the fact that the feature eliminated the abdomen articulation point should, in theory, annoy me. But it doesn’t. The ab crunch can be skipped in certain cases, and I think Roboto is one where it’s fine. His action feature is iconic, and I think, after Battle Armor He-Man, Mattel may have realized that some of the action features are so important to fans’ memories that they’re worth implementing.

As for the action feature itself: it works great. It doesn’t cause the mouth to open and close as it did on the vintage figure, but that’s because of the head having a ball joint–and had they gotten rid of that point of articulation, I would have been annoyed. So they played that one right.

(One a side note, I think this bitter Shortpacked strip is unfair. Yes, He-Fans have complained about a lot of silly things, but I can’t recall reading a single complaint about the action feature on Roboto. Willis got this one wrong.)

Plastic & Paint: Roboto is molded in blue, red, purple, and clear plastic. I like the strong, bright color choices for the limbs.

The blue “circuitry” on the arms has some slight shiny dry brushing to bring out the details, and for the most part, it looks good. While there have been reports of heavy slop, I don’t think my Roboto has any more than any other MOTUC figure, with one exception: the “wash” on the legs.

I’m not sure if it’s a wash, or just someone tried to trace along the details of the legs with a black paint brush, but the effect is a mixed bag. On the one hand, the black tracing of the details on the legs was something that really appealed to me about the figure, and made the overall look more interesting. On the other hand, it was so amateurishly executed that it largely ruins the effect.

Finally, there’s the clear plastic torso. While from an aesthetic standpoint I think it looks good, it seems Mattel failed to do adequate quality control tests on the clear plastic, as a number of Robotos have been arriving with small cracks in the plastic. Mine doesn’t have any, fortunately, but I’m still going to make sure he doesn’t fall off the shelf.

Articulation: Roboto features ball joints at the neck, shoulders, and hips; hinged joints at the jaw, knees, elbows, and ankles; swivel joints at the biceps, wrists, top of the thighs, top of the boots, and waist; and “rocker” ankles. His ankles are nice and tight–common with the Trap Jaw legs, in my experience at least.

Accessories: Roboto comes with his vintage arm attachments–an axe, a blaster, and a claw–as well as a new item, a regular right hand. The right hand is a fantastic addition, allowing you to arm him with some of the more Roboto-appropriate weaponry (I recommend the electronic Power Sword from Man-At-Arms).

The arm attachments are made from a very soft plastic; I’m not sure why, given that Trap Jaw was able to use a much harder material. The soft plastic used for Roboto’s weapons is responsible for the serious warping you see on the gun in particular. It’s disappointing, and while a few minutes with a hair dryer, then a dip in cold water, will fix it right up, I shouldn’t have to spend time fixing my action figures as soon as they arrive.

Quality Control: Roboto seems to have suffered from a host of QC issues. First there are the infamous reversed shoulders; it’s worth noting that the shoulders themselves were incorrectly marked “L” and “R”, meaning the problem was a tooling issue, not the fault of the factory workers, who simply followed what had been stamped on the shoulders themselves.

As I mentioned, there have been reports of really bad paint apps, bobbleheads, bent weapons and cracked plastic torsos. As you can see from my pics, my paint apps are decent, if not great. I haven’t found any cracks on his torso, and his neck joint is fairly tight. As the pics show, I do have the bent-weapons problem, however.

It’s always worth noting that QC on a $20 figure of this relative level of simplicity is, well, not “unacceptable”–since I’ve accepted it, time and again–but very, very annoying.

Update: I neglected to mention that my Roboto also suffers from one of my worst pet peeves on these figures: his right foot is slightly bent at the bottom center, meaning that the middle of the bottom of the foot curves upward and won’t sit flush against the ground. I hate this issue, as the heat-and-fix method doesn’t really work on a piece as large and thick as the foot, and it just looks bad. Roboto’s isn’t so bent that I can’t ignore it, but whenever I happen to notice it, it bugs me. Mattel: stop this from happening.

Overall: One thing I can’t really convey in a standard review is the fact that, while a figure may have some significant problems, I sometimes come to really like it anyway. Roboto is one of those figures. The bright colors, the swappable limbs, the articulated jaw, even the action feature come together to make him a charming addition to MOTUC. Now that I have the figure in hand, the shoulders actually don’t bother me at all, and I doubt I’ll even buy a second one when he’s reissued.

But he does have problems, so I have to drop his score. He’s a well-executed feature, and had the shoulders been correct, the weapons been better made, and the paint been sharper, he would have been close to a five-raven figure. As it is, he gets an average score.

111/200

Comments now closed (22)

  • Read corn popper and my mind immediately went to "Corn Baller."

    Roboto was one of the few MOTU figures I had as a kid during my life before TMNT (all three years of it). This line is getting really hard to resist, especially with the TRUs near me being loaded with the 2-packs.

  • Silly Poe–someone somewhere complained about the action feature–probably in irritation that some other figure did not/will not get the action feature the original MOTU figure had.

    Also, isn't the strip saying that hearing someone complain about a feature that is pretty much universally liked (i.e. someone will always complain) is what has driven Matty to be such a jerkwad?

  • I thought that "Shortpacked" was right on. While it may have been exaggerated for comedic effect (maybe a tiny bit) it got its point across. It is a humor strip, not a documentary. 😉

    People are always complaining about every little thing and when there is a problem (the shoulder swap) some folks act like its the end of the world and then they buy the figure anyway. These guys are like nagging housewives. Eventually the husband has to turn a deaf ear to preserve his sanity. That's what happen to Matty. He listened, his mind snapped and he became the Dillhole he is today.

  • Nice look at Roboto, Poe. The writing is always more difficult for me when I'm doing a figure that doesn't have the nostalgia component.

    You bring up a funny point with the circuitry because the vintage Roboto does have a simple circuitry pattern on the plastic plate that separated his front and back. One of the few vintage elements that wasn't replicated this go round.

  • @jestergoblin: Oww!!! Sonnova !@#$%$#@!@#$%!!!!!

    @The Flash x3: Didn't you see the "SIGN THIS PETITION FOR MATTY TO CHANGE THE COLORS OF THE GEARS" or the "THE VINTAGE ROBOTO DIDN'T HAVE A HEART, SO NEITHER SHOULD THE MOTUC ROBOTO" threads at the Dot Orgy.

    I might not have hit the lottery, but I think I got a runner-up prize, because my Roboto's torso isn't cracked, doesn't have too much paint slop, isn't a bobble head, and the weapons didn't seem to be warped too badly. I can live with a couple reversed shoulders. I'm annoyed but at this point what am I going to do? He's on the top shelf of my display with the rest of the Masters so in the long run I can live with it.

  • I'm fairly certain the vintage Roboto DOES have a heart. Isn't the center gear, the red one, shaped like a heart? Visible only from the back?

    I admit I haven't seen my vintage toy in probably over a decade, and I have no access to it now since it's on the other side of the world from me….but I remember being really impressed as a child that the detail from the mini-comic was present in the toy.

    Or am I crazy??

    Someone please clear this up for me!!!

  • A very thorough and fair review Poe. The best I've seen so far, followed closely by Itsalltrue.net. Thank you sir.

    It really is a shame. If Roboto's QC had been a little tighter, he would have been a superb figure.

    Good call giving him Man-At-Arms pistol. It looks pretty neat with him. The colors match quite well.

  • Perhaps a young Poe would have thought robots should have circuitry, but I hope adult Poe can admit that clockwork robots are fucking awesome.

  • @NoisyDvL5: I don't have any vintage MOTU figures anymore, so I'm not sure what you're talking about. Is the circuitry inside the chest?

    @RageTreb: Of course I do–as long as said robot is made of bronze or copper and was built in an alternative universe Victorian-era Earth. But the mixture of tech and clockwork on Roboto doesn't work as well for me. Still, it's a cool feature.

  • @Poe: Tik-Tok, my thoughts exactly!

    I think one of the reasons why I always liked MOTU was the mix of sorcery and sci-fi. I like it about 50/50, maybe 60/40, fantasy and sci-fi respectively. Its just an interesting mix that you can have dragons, swamp monsters and all sorts of weird places and creatures, then throw that into the mix killer robots, armored vehicles, and lazers!

    I know He-Man Dot Org has a fairly extensive catalogue of all of the old vintage figures, but the images aren't the greatest. Ha anyone gone through the task of reviewing photographing them all? Perhaps something similar to the excellent Seibertron image archives which has everything including Takara, Gee Wun, Animated, up to the current Generations and Hunt for the Decepticons lines.

  • actually, Poe, I was one of those that did complain about the action feature on Classics Roboto; mainly because I think doing 5 molds for each gear just to get 'em right was an utter waste that took away from other, potentially more worthwhile features we could've gotten, like the shoulder harness. Or that extra head for Grizzlor that was never tooled…or something to make Buzz Off look cooler.

  • Roboto, from the original line, was a shark jumper for me. But I really like this new figure. He's grown on me.

    He needs the gears to move, or he would just look stupid with a chunk of plastic in his chest. I also think that the gear from his waist will allow for Sy-Clone in the future. Look how it comes up at just the right height for your thumb.

    Oddly enough, I want Ram-Man to not have his feature. Just a straight up figure would be nice.

    As for making him a chess robot? Really? Man-At-Arms builds the only robot on Eternia and it's for playing chess?

  • I just hope that After Roboto the Action features don't start creeping up on the line.

  • Fair review.

    Reading that strip reminded me how much I dislike the mattycollector.com logo. I remember a while a go I was on mattycollector, looking at the upcoming figures. My brother comes in, looks ant the logo, and asks “Why does their mascot look like a smug jackass?” If they used a smiling face like in the comic that would have been a much better logo, to me at least.

    Out of curiosity, Poe. Can Roboto hold the blaster attachment in his other hand?

  • @Russ: Roboto w/o the gears would make him NOT look like Roboto. I'm curious as to what your alternative would have been had they not used money to mold those gears…?

  • I imagine that for those saying the individual gears was a problem, just having one solid sculpted piece which inserted into a hollow torso would be the expected method of creating an action feature free figure.

    I don't mind the action feature. It is kind of cool, although I'm afraid that it will break… It seems fragile.

  • So Roboto does indeed have a heart afterall. I still didn't see the circuitry, but my Roboto is a little worse for wear… the clear plastic is a little cloudy, his legs are purple, and I can't find his attachments… well, I only ever had the axe/blade thing anyways, but still, can't find it.

    All that said, the gears still function. I should have listened to my mother all those years ago and never have taken him into the sandbox, what a mistake that was!

  • My paints are horrible on his legs, like a drunk kid was doing the work…and my Roboto's left foot isn't put to gether all the way..it sticks slightly out..argh..