Scott Neitlich has posted a very long and–credit where it’s due–thorough explanatory post up about all the recent issues surrounding Masters of the Universe Classics. It does wrap up with a little of the “we should be thankful we have figures at all” attitude that really rubs many the wrong way, but overall I think it does patch up (not repair, but patch up) some of the damage of the last couple of months.
Text after the jump.
MOTU Fans,
Hey gang, Scott “Toy Guru” Neitlich here…
A lot has gone down in the last 60 days or so and it being 2012 (the 30th anniversary of the brand!) I want to try and clear the air, squash some rumors and move forward together with all of our customers and fans for a great 2012 and beyond.
So first off, the line is doing FANTASTIC! Yes, we have had some shipping delays that pushed Demo-Man into January and Sorceress into February (more on this below) but this is not the Seventh Sign of the Apocalypse for the line. I know customers were caught off guard by the recent schedule changes and apologize for that. We are all very passionate about getting new figures as soon as possible. But Mattel also wants to deliver the best product possible and that means delays will happen from time to time. Expect them on all Mattycollector.com lines (the LOSH 12-pack shipped over 14 month later than originally announced, but it did make it out there!). Shipping delays do and will continue to happen – they are not something Mattel is in a position to “compensate” fans for. There are just too many variables, from vendor issues, to weather conditions on the ocean, to simple things like human error. This is a case where I urge fans to take a different mind set and just assume there will be delays every now and then in our effort to get you the best product possible. Better to accept delays leading to schedule changes and expect from time to time as a part of collecting an online toy line.
Honestly, I was never that bothered by the Demo-Man delay itself. I understand, crap happens. It was the lack of communication for weeks that irked me.
As for the big elephant in the room, let me try to clarify what happened with the Demo-Man delay:
He totally missed an opportunity for a Snout Spout joke here.
Demo-Man was (and is) tied into the 2011 subscription, so we needed to “sell” him in 2011. At the last minute, we found out that he was not going to be 100% in stock by December 15th so we made the call to sell him, but not ship him until he was in stock. In hindsight, this was not the best plan.
The result was mass confusion, only enhanced by the fact that I did a poor job communicating what happened to the fans and customers. We never intended for this to spiral out of control like this. To add insult to injury, additional unexpected delays happened in early January which then pushed him from shipping in early January to mid-January Again, not what we intended, but it happened and it was not something we wanted to happen.
To correct this, going forward we are committed to communicating better with our customers and explain issues/delays like this upfront. We also changed our policy so that we will not sell a figure until it is 100% in stock.
Kudos for committing to communicating better, but now comes the hard part–following through on that commitment.
This is why we needed to move Sorceress and Fearless Photog out to February. We may need to move other figures around in 2012 (for many brands) as well. Moves like this should be expected and are a normal part of business for an online collector toy line.
Another bug in the system has been quality control. Obviously, we constantly do everything we can to put out the best product possible. When running a high-end collector line at EXTREMELY low quotas, there will sometimes be production problems. If you do receive an item that is damaged or incorrect, please call Customer Service and send it back for a replacement. Please note that Mattel’s policy is that we do not replace product until the original has been returned. You must return the defective item to get a replacement. We will not be replacing items without a return (yes, we will pay for shipping!).
Or, y’know, we won’t send you a replacement. Ahem. (I know I know, it’s my fault for believing to what the CS person told me and not pushing ahead to the Escalation Dept.)
I also want to address our absolute commitment to improving customer service. Yes, there has been some poor communication in the past and customers have had difficulty with things like changing addresses or credit cards and finding out the status of orders. We are 100% committed to making these things an issue of the past and are actively working with our partners at Digital River to make massive improvements. For example, we hope to announce soon a new functionality to the site that will give you much more control over changing your address, credit cards, etc. Please continue to let us know how we can improve and what the biggest issues are. We want to fix them and constantly improve. Thank you for your understanding as we keep working on this to make the buying and shipping process as smooth as possible.
Didn’t we hear about this imminent “new functionality” ages ago? I know I heard about it as last as early as NYCC in October. Anyway, agreed that “massive” improvements are in order on the CS front.
Also, to hit a few other small points floating around the net:
1: Yes, Wind Raider “sold out” but it still only did okay for us. This is due to the extremely high tooling of an item like this. We “sold out,” but we were very conservative on our quota. Taking 3 days to sell through an extremely small number of Wind Raiders is why it was judged as only doing “okay.” For the very small number of units we produced, we needed to see a slightly faster sell-through to convince management that a fully tooled vehicle is the right expansion for the line.
I’ll accept this argument. I still think they might have done better if they sold the Battle Ram first, however. The Wind Raider is fun, but there are more popular MOTU vehicles out there.
Future vehicles are not off the table, we just need to relook at how we offer them and the price points and quota. There will not be a vehicle in 2012 (not due to Wind Raider sales, but rather due to offering Granamyr, the giant dragon!) and we will wait to see how the 2013 subscription sells before announcing any more larger fully tooled items like vehicles. Honestly, supporting the sub is the best way to tell upper management there is a robust customer base and larger items should be considered.
MOTUC is absolutely transitioning to a much more subscription-based line going forward. We need these sub holders to maintain the minimum production quota we know will sell (“day of” sales are more like icing on the cake). So when the 2013 sub goes on sale in July, your purchase is your vote for more MOTUC toys and more large items. I’m not trying to make you spend more, but we highly encourage you to purchase a sub, not only to show your interest, but day-of stock will continue to go down as we concentrate on sub quotas only. There will be some day-of product in 2012, but not as much as we had in the past. There will also not be reissues going forward of any figure past Man-E-Faces. (Older reissue figures may still be available from time to time, and He-Man and Skeletor will be up throughout 2012 for new fans or those who want to celebrate the 30th with the core characters!)
Here’s my question: if the large items aren’t selling well enough, will they simply be excised from the line (thus lowering the sub cost), or will these shadowy management figures cancel the line altogether?
2: Some fans pointed out they would prefer a revised hip piece on the new females to make the legs higher. I did check with design and indeed the change between the prototypes and the final product is 100% the logistics of translating a non-articulated prototype into a fully articulated plastic toy. Fans see the Horsemen sculpts at cons with small pegs and more deco opts, and expect this to be reflected in all the final product. But when we have to cost out a figure and physically translate a non-articulated statue into a movable figure, adjustments have to be made. This is why the toys don’t always match the prototypes. Mass producing plastic, movable, articulated figures is A LOT different from hand-painting and sculpting a one-of-a-kind prototype.
Design has also confirmed that the current 2.0 female pelvis piece also has to accommodate 3 different types of female legs. This universal nature of this piece is one of the reasons the legs ride lower. We can absolutely look into developing a new female hip piece in the future, but this won’t happen with the next female in the line. Figures are costed out months, if not years, in advance. We can’t just “add” a new tooled piece this late in the game for any 2012 figures. It takes 12-14 months to develop something like this. But we will certainly look into this in our effort to always improve product! Thanks for the great feedback.
I’ll admit I’m not really in the loop on this issue. I haven’t noticed anything significantly wrong with my female figures, but I haven’t been looking that closely.
3: Fans overwhelmingly asked us to ship Shadow Weaver in February, so we will not be moving her to March. Thank for the feedback!
4: The Create a Figure Contest entry period is over. Please do not send in more entries, they will be discarded and not judged. Also, please note that all entries remain the property of Mattel. We will not be returning any entries to the creators (even if you included a return envelope). For legal reasons, we are required to hold onto all entries whether they win or not.
At the end of the day, (and I know I have said this before), despite shipping delays and the occasional quality problem, we are all flipping getting new MOTUC figures every month! Seriously! Do you ever take a step back and just look at your MOTUC shelf? It is so easy to be negative and point out things we want different (I do this all the time and drive our design team nuts!) but man, just to take a look at that ever growing MOTUC shelf… did you really ever think we would get a Griffin figure or the Star Sisters? Man, how cool is this line shaping up?!
A few years ago there was no MOTUC product at all. The very fact that new figures come out every month is really an amazing thing, especially when you take into account this is only sold online with no entertainment support. MOTUC really is the little line that could. I know we are all very passionate about MOTUC (me too!) but for Mattel, MOTUC is not Barbie or Hot Wheels. We put everything we can into it and, for the very small audience and customer base MOTUC has, we try to get as many resources as we can.
There will always be nitpicks here and there – that this figure could have been different or that this figure could have shipped at a different time. But at the end of the day, man, what an amazing line MOTUC has become and show no sign of stopping anytime soon. As long as these figures are selling, we will do all our best to continue growing the line. With so many awesome figures on tap for 2012, the future has never looked better for MOTUC!
So in conclusion, I personally apologize for the Demo-Man delay. Communication was handled poorly (by myself) but delays do and will continue to happen. Expect them rather then get angry over them (you’ll feel better and not be angry all the time!). But by no longer shipping product until it is 100% in stock, we shouldn’t see a Demo-Man issue again.
Our next big reveal will be at Collector Night at New York Toy Fair on February 12 from 3pm-6pm ET. This is a press-only event but expect at least four new MOTUC products to be shown. And I’ll be on hand to do a live Q & A and clear up any remaining issues.
Happy 30th anniversary, everyone. With so much great stuff on tap for the rest of the year and beyond, MOTU is ready to take the world by storm!
Good Journey!
Scott Neitlich
As I said, a pretty thorough note. There’s enough frankness and honesty in there to make it a decent piece of damage control, though I could have done without the lecturing/ra-ra-cheering at the end.
But here’s the important thing: we’ve heard promises about improving communication, customer service, and quality control on this line before. Several times. And yet the problems keep happening. I won’t blame anyone for being skeptical about this latest round of promises. Here’s hoping Mattel follows through this time.
Tribsaint
Do you ever look at you MotUC shelf? WTF!!! NO I don’t I don’t have one, But I’ m sure that those that do, look at their wallets. Those wallets are quiet a bit lighter thanks to Mattel. So, MotUC isn’t Barbie or Hot Wheels, then Mattel needs to please stop making MotUC. If a line isn’t deserving of the full treatment please cancel it. Image if I as a teacher took this tacket with student that I knew were not going to be high achieving or just let them know they aren’t as important as the other students. This letter wouldn’t fly anywhere or with anyone besides fan boy collector community. I would be livid if I was anywhere and someone tried to placate me with something like this letter. Granted some of the bitsing and moaning was out of line, but the last 3 to 5 paragraphs are a slap in the face to you guys that buy MotUC. But what do I care I don’t buy it.
ridureyu
Thing is, a lot of this is because Mattel really only sells Barbie and Hot Wheels. Everything else just gets in the way, and it's pretty likely that there's a constant struggle to keep DC and MOTU lines from being deepo-sixed at any given moment.
stack32
"Do you ever take a step back and just look at your MOTUC shelf?" I do, and when I look at it I'm starting to think "These aren't good enough to make up for dealing with Mattel all the time."
dean
Allow me to pee in the punchbowl for a moment 🙂 …
What Matty is saying is there is only one way…the Matty way. Either suck it up and follow along blindly, or don't buy our product. It's all in or not at all. That sucks for people who love the property but aren't blindly devoted enough to pay for Mattel's cock-ups.
We simply want the best possible product. Money is not the issue. We'll pay, but not if you F us around. You are the world's largest toy company…you have money out the @$$. Meet us halfway. Fix the QC. Stop cheaping out on certain figures. Don't hose us over when it comes to exclusives. Make great product, treat us like we really do matter, and we will spend OUR hard earned money on your toys. You want us to $h!t or get of the pot…how about you do the same. Commit dammit, and stop giving us lip service. Actions speak louder than words. Don't scale back when collectors don't fork over the dough. Figure out why they didn't and fix it. Sheesh.
Rant over…oh, and don't drink the punch. 🙂
carlis
There's no corporation that will ever meet the customer halfway. That's the whole point of corporatism: they dictate the terms and the customer accepts or refuses the product. The only way to affect change is to not buy the product, which causes the company to either improve or stop selling the product. Which will Mattell do?
@rxchrisg
"This is a case where I urge fans to take a different mind set and just assume there will be delays every now and then…"
He seriously said this. Publicly. And people will still line up to subscribe to this mess.
@RMtheartist
Delays happen. I don't see what problem anyone has with delays of just one month.
Rustin Parr
I agree that the Wind Raider is an oddly circuitous defense. At first reading it makes sense but it stuck with me and the more I think about the more it seems like the constant "the line's never doing well enough" schtick from Scott. Would two days have also been deemed "okay," or even just one day?
Just like his egregious "the future has never looked brighter" after just dedicating a couple paragraphs to product selling "only okay" and the whole model shifting over to buy-a-subscription-or-kill-the-line. Things actually seem a bit dimmer to me than in the past.
Remember when WE had to convince THEM to offer a subscription? And now THEY are telling US thats the only way to support the line? It's really all just playing into the Corporate Mattel's pursuit of greed which is making this line less appealing. Because he's telling me essentially I have to buy in I'm doubting renewing my sub for the first time. Especially if it means I'll continue having to pay for things I have no interest in (like most anything from the ancillary franchises).
misterbigbo
Thank you to Scott for acknowledging the fan concerns and apologizing for them, but you just opened up so many new avenues for criticism. . . I can't understand it. I mean, really, the affect for this fan is this line is such a pain to keep up with that I'm going to focus less and less on it, positive and negative, and as a result I'm drifting away as you read this. Me and my dollars. And I'm not alone.
Newton Gimmick
The Wind Raider thing still makes no sense to me. Three days is not a good gage on sales. I don't care what they say. Didn't the Wind Raider drop right around Christmas or after? Is that not considered at all? You know, that people might have other priorities and couldn't buy it within the first 15 minutes it went on sale?
The Wind Raider thing is an example of Scott sticking his foot in his mouth. He should have never said anything about the Wind Raider at all. Or at best said that, there's no vehicles planned for 2012, but that it was always that way because they wanted to test the Wind Raider and they were glad to see it sold out, but were a little concerned with it's sell speed. Not that Wind Raider just did okay despite selling out, because that makes no sense. All he did was reveal that the people in charge of this line, obviously has some insane quota for what they consider a success. If a toy doesn't sell out in a few hours, it's a failure. That's just absurd.
1ManzOhpinyon
It's hilarious when the geeks think that THEY know how a toy company should be run. Let people do their job and accept that life is not all berries and creams. Mistakes, unforeseeable difficulties and LIFE, all happen sometimes. There are far worse things to be enraged about.
1ManzOhpinyon
And I don't mean to offend anyone, and understand most of us are all cool cats, but too many violently vocal collectors is starting to ruin the fun like pee in the punchbowl.
Colin
Here's an issue that didn't get resolved involving the Create-A-Figure contest. While admittedly I'm quite grouchy that I couldn't put forward a design because I'm Canadian and it's U.S. only entries, I don't get this whole bit about the contest being wrapped up on December 31, when every recent box offering including the Wind Raider says the contest is closing on January 31, 2012. A pretty big typo there not to address…
The_Fun_has_been_Doubled
So, basically sub or die is going to become a reality.
I don't subscribe due to the Large scale items AND I'm not fond of the idea of being locked in a $500+"subscription"
Now, regarding everything else, I'll believe it when I see it.
Valo487
If they had simply said all this in the first place, I think it would have avoided a lot of frustration. I’m glad they finally decided to apologize for what happened, though why that wasn’t their first course of action is beyond me. Only two things still need clarification to me:
1- If larger scale items aren’t as successful, is Mattel going to be more selective with larger items going forward or are they going to say “The fans aren’t supporting the line!” They love to talk about the different SKUs, so I don’t want to see the monthly figures take a hit over a creature or vehicle ‘underperforming.’
2- How many more times are we going to hear the song and dance about how MOTU exists in spite of lack of multimedia tie-in or retail presence? It exists because the fans are willing to tolerate every stupid thing Mattel does out of love for the characters and pay a substantial amount of money every year to get them. Stop acting like you’re doing us a favor.
Dark Angel
Oh, look, words. Again. We need to see actions.
And yeah, the rah-rah at the end was grating, to say the least. MOTU figures are being manufactured (in limited quantitites) that we can actually buy (on certain days for a brief period)! How exciting!
Heli
Indeed; these are the same promises we've been getting for years. Until things actually change, they're still just promises.
Also, as for the female hip thing, they've got a perfectly good crotch piece tooled already; Battleground Teela. For some reason, they then developed another piece that doesn't look as good, and that's the one they continue to use.
And lastly, I understand the importance of subscription sales, but I fail to understand how increasing production for day-of is not a good thing. The tooling is already developed, and we're told repeatedly that the real cost of toy production is in that step. Wouldn't it lower your overall cost per figure to produce a few more figures to sell? The frustrating thing about this question is that I know I'll never get an answer, because there are arcane factors involved that mortal man is not allowed to know.
noveltynostalgia
Heh, despite the honesty, his comments made me go "Hah!" in sarcasm a number of times. I'll believe it when I see it, thank you very much.