Poe Probes > Reviewing Samples, Part 3: Julius Marx of AFI

This is the third in a series of articles about the practice of toy reviewers being given free samples for review, and whether that represents a problem for readers looking for honest assessments to make purchase decisions. You can find the other articles in the series here.

Today’s piece was written by Julius Marx of ActionFigureInsider.

For me personally I do features rather than reviews on AFI.   There is no shortage of review sites out there, and even more when you include the youtube reviewers.    I don’t value my opinion over anyone elses and I’m not vain enough to think that anyone else cares what I think.  🙂  And I have found in all my years doing this, often times when I get something that I have read a bad review online for, often times I will like the item better than they did.  Different folks like different things. (more…)

Poe Probes > Reviewing Samples, Part 2: VeeBee of TheFwoosh.com

This is the second in a series of articles about the practice of toy reviewers being given free samples for review, and whether that represents a problem for readers looking for honest assessments to make purchase decisions. You can find the other articles in the series here.

Today’s Q&A is with VeeBee of TheFwoosh.

1.) When you receive free samples, do you find an urge to be kinder to the item than you might be? If so, do you find yourself softening a bit, do you try to simply be fair, or do you think you end up trying to be even more objective than usual?

It’s funny, I have never really thought of myself as a toy reviewer. In our First Looks, the only kind of format that I ever try to adhere to comes from the pictures, not the wordage. I suppose the one place I feel responsible for providing something to other collectors is in bright, clear pictures that focus on the toy itself and nothing more. That is why I make a conscious choice to provide neutral lighting and backgrounds (well that, and because I could never in a million years do what Matt K does, he is my action figure hero). More than anything I still believe that those that view our First Look articles make their preliminary judgments on any product from the pictures (if anything). Sometimes seeing a small action figure blown up many times its actual scale can be jarring, but pictures show what is there, warts and all, for everyone to see.

As far as written content goes, I don’t focus much on review receptions because my articles are usually 75% anecdotal/conversational. That is mainly because these are colloquial in nature, like I am just talking to a friends about toys. Often times, they are all over the place. I can talk about toys for hours and sometimes I realize that articles can feel just like me talking to myself about any given toy. Toy collecting is my hobby, and it is a hobby that I love very, very much. I am a glass half full guy by nature but I think just having a pragmatic approach to anything you present for public consumption is the best method. I have not really ever focused on reigning in enthusiasm, that is just not who I am. I have such a love for so many of the properties and characters, and nostalgia for the things I collect that composing First Look articles has just become an extension of that. I get more response from the personal stories or anecdotes in our First Looks than anything else. I feel fortunate because I only really know how to write for myself, but being able to strike a chord here and there with someone else is always a fun experience. There are a lot of places to read reviews out there, many of which are very concisely written with the most fine-toothed comb. That is good because the internet is a big place and it takes all kinds, but I present things as something that I would like to read myself. I think I am like most collectors out there in that I am going to be the one to form my opinion about an actual toy, not have someone else do it for me. So I am realistic about others coming to their own conclusions with toy in hand, not from reading on the internet. What I personally like to read is the history, attachment and stories people will share about their toys. The boom in nostalgia lines really fuels that and it can make for funny, endearing and engaging reading. That is pocket of the community I like play in the most, so I generally go in that direction.

There are a lot of sites out there that provide product previews. Some just take pictures, some go into painstaking review, some pose and play on video and some like to tell stories. I think that is great for everyone, including the companies. It makes for well-rounded reading and just about everyone can find a place to gravitate towards and ultimately, companies have the coverage saturation they want. In the end, I go with what pops into my head about any particular toy and I am always sincere, something that is aided by just not over thinking or over interpreting what may or may not be there. You simply cannot write for everyone but if you can relate to someone out there by doing what you do, then all the better. I just like to have fun it all and hopefully provide some enjoyment to my fellow geeks. (more…)

Poe Probes > Reviewing Samples, Part 1: Introduction

Shooting Around - Groninger Museum

Shooting Around - Groninger Museum by Niels Kim, on Flickr

Quite a while back, I got to wondering how toy collectors felt about reviews of toys that were provided as free review samples to reviewers. It’s a fairly common practice among most other industries such as movies, television, music, electronics, and videogames. However, the reviewers in those industries are almost always employed (or at least paid) by professional journalistic publications with reader bases that expect honest reviews, and therefore have a vested interest in being as objective as possible.

In most such cases, there is little concern that a bad review will prevent them from getting a review sample from the same company in the future, for three reasons. First off, a review publication should never count on review samples – it’s just bad business. Second, often the publication has enough clout that a publisher/manufacturer will want or even feel it has to provide a review sample. I’m thinking of your New York Times, your Rolling Stone, your CNET, your IGN; these places get review samples because companies know it’s the best way to publicize their product (and even a middling or bad review is often better than no one knowing your product exists).

(more…)

PGPoA’s Guide to Third Party Transformers Products

With Playmates’ announcement of a new Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtle line based on the 1980s cartoon, the circle of nostalgia for the toy industry is just about complete. The TMNT, Snake Eyes, He-Man, and Luke and Leia have come and gone a few times since the ’80s, but one property has always had a spot on the shelf: the Transformers. Kids love cars, robots and the idea of getting two toys for the price of one. (On the other hand, there are the Go-Bots…)


I certainly loved my original Transformers toys, but even back then I could tell something was amiss. The robots who waged war on my carpet in the afternoon didn’t look exactly like the ones battling over the fate of the planet on TV. The designers had taken quite a bit of creative license in order to get the Autobots and Decepticons into streamlined character models that would be easy to animate. (more…)

How to Make a Monster (Photo, That Is)

How to Make a Monster....

Last week, I ran this Pic of the Day by Ed Speir IV. Featuring Hasbro’s G.I. Joe Hazard-Viper and Zombie-Viper, I declared it one of my favorite POTDs ever.

Given its cinematic look and style, I asked Ed if he wouldn’t mind describing how he made it. –PG

Here is a brief description of how the “How to Make a Monster” pic came about. I have included three pics for reference as well.

First, we’ll start with the props. There are basically three layers to this shot. (more…)

The Great MOTUC Debate, Revisited

motu-classics

You’ll recall back in December of last year, I posted a series of articles with quotes from various high-profile collectors regarding their thoughts on Masters of the Universe Classics. (You can read them here and here.)

Well, it’s been nine months, and at this point it’s safe to say that MOTUC has been a success. However, a financial success does not always equal an artistic success (see Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen), so I thought I’d contact some of the contributors from last time and see whether their thoughts on MOTUC have changed since the line debuted.

There are a couple more contributors I was waiting on–I’ll add their comments if/when i receive them. (more…)

The effect of inflation on action figure prices

He-Man.org member Mermisto has written up an interesting post examining inflation and it’s relation to the action figure industry. It’s something I’ve been meaning to do but never got around to it, and I think Mermisto did a better job anyway because he had access to the old Sears Wish Book catalogs.

I’m not going to blockquote what he wrote (it’ll screw up the page after the “Read More”). His post starts with the quotations.

“When the MOTUC series was first announced, I thought the $20 price tag was a little much for an action figure, but since I have been collecting vintage toys over the past decade, I am used to paying over $20 a piece for dolls and action figures anyways, so it did not bother me too much.

However, I was recently curious as to how expensive the toys I grew up with really were. I know a lot of times nowadays I tend to look at prices at Target and Wal-Mart with vintage goggles on, as I remember back to the 1980’s when I could get She-Ra or Catra for $6.99 at K-Mart back in 1985.

So, using a handy price inflation converter, I looked up all the prices in my vintage Sears Wish Books, and converted them into current prices. (I rounded the current prices to the nearest dollar, or five dollar increments if they were over $20.)

1985

Toy / Original Price / Price If Sold Today

Castle Grayskull / 29.99 / 59.99
Snake Mountain / 44. 99 / 89.99
Night Stalker / 8.99 / 17.99
Spydor / 24.99 / 49.99
Bashasaurus / 13.99 / 29.99
Fright Zone / 28.99 / 59.99
Hordak / 5.49 / 10.99
Thunder Punch He-Man / 6.99 / 13.99
Modulok / 7.99 / 15.99
Land Shark / 11.99 / 24.99
Crystal Castle / 32.99 / 69.99
She-Ra / 6.99 / 13.99
Enchanta Swan / 17.99 / 34.99
She-Ra with Swift Wind / 14.99 / 29.99
(more…)

TAtTF: Talkin’ about the Talkboy

toyadsthattimeforgot

Ahhh the days when a simple tape recorder could bring joy to a mischievous youth. If you’ve ever seen the movie Home Alone 2, you might just remember that our hero Kevin sported a Talkboy as one of his tools to defeat the nefarious thieves who want to brutally murder him. The Talkboy was actually made up for the film. According to Wikipedia, the real life toy version came about from a massive letter writing campaign by fans of the movie. I really hope that Wikipedia is wrong, because otherwise I may have to kill myself knowing that those fans are still out there.

One of the strangest aspects of this commercial is the kid’s tireless and relentless campaign to stop his sister from getting laid. If that isn’t some sort of exercise in the realm of Freud, then I don’t know what is.

And that slowed down devil voice? That’s just friggen scary.

Guns guns guns!

ds_gun

“C’mon, Sal! Tigers are playing tonight! I never miss a game.”

One of the many ways I enjoy my action figures/waste time is, when an action figure comes with some sort of gun, I try to identify what type of gun it is (or what type inspired its design, in some cases). With military action figures, it’s usually pretty obvious what the guns are, as those guys are obsessed with accuracy and the name of the gun is usually spelled out on the packaging.

But for the DC Universe Classics line, sculptors the Four Horsemen have a bit more freedom in their designs. (more…)

Stand! (in the place where your figures are)

As action figures have become more poseable and dynamic, collectors have been looking for ways to pose their figures in more than just the typical “soldier in formation” look. Other figures simply tend to fall over a lot (looking at you, JLU). So it’s not surprising a number of action figure manufacturers and third-party companies now offer a range of ways to get your action figures looking their best.

This is just a quick overview of some of the better-known display stands available for 3 ¾” and 5″-7″ figures. (more…)